As humanity advances in various sectors such as infrastructure, medicine, transportation, and technology, our warfare tactics also advance. Wars are no longer fought and won with brute strength or sheer numbers alone. Information, deception, and psychological warfare is what makes the difference in the modern era. The late Chinese war strategist and philosopher, Sun Tzu, understood this.
“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” - Sun Tzu, Art of War
Due to these advancements in tactics, war is no longer typically announced. Modern wars begin long before the general public is even aware of the situation. Preparations are made in secret, sometimes hiding in plain sight. The escalating tensions between the United States, Russia, several Middle Eastern nations, and China have garnered widespread attention in the news.
Major media outlets shed light on the situation (such as the Chinese “weather balloon” back in 2023?) but fail to inform the general public of the true severity. It is a necessity to not only be aware, but to be prepared for the future. This article will showcase various different points of interests that U.S opposition has as well as the effects that these things can have on the general public.
Before we begin diving into the government hearings, local news headlines, case studies and security footage that cements the idea that the U.S is actively and openly being attacked let's address an issue that can cause further damage to the country if we don’t acknowledge it. We need to acknowledge that while some immigrants of various nationalities have ties to malicious organizations there are also many that are coming into the country simply seeking asylum.
It is important to not generate a sense of hatred towards the nationalities we speak of. If we abandon this idea and begin to resent each other, we would be playing right into the opposition’s hand. That being said, it is also the duty of any country to vet the people coming into their borders in order to maintain national security.
Let’s move on.
Border Crisis
"If you're a bad guy that wants to infiltrate operatives into the U.S.A., the southern border is a pretty easy way to do it," - Rebecca Grant Ph.D., a national security analyst at IRIS Independent Research
At the time of writing, U.S Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided the numbers for encounters across all borders of the United States. Their numbers were last updated on 1/26/24, so expect these numbers to be much higher now. For the purpose of this article, we’ll be looking strictly at single adults entering the country, seeing as these are the primary individuals that hold the most cause for suspicion.
Nationwide Single Adult Encounters by Month (Fiscal Year)
As you can see, 2023 shattered the record 2022 held by over 400,000 people. 2024 is predicted to set a new all-time record as over 500,000 single adults have already entered the country illegally in only 3 months (October, November, December). In total, we are looking at nearly 6 million single adults crossing into USA illegally in the span of only 3 1/2 years. Whole most of these immigrants are arriving from Mexico, many are also coming from China, Russia, and numerous Middle Eastern nations.
These countries are united by a common thread: significant tensions with the United States.
With numbers so large, it would be wise to assume that there are people amongst these groups that are coming into the U.S with malicious intent.
And you’d be correct.
In fact, the U.S Department of Homeland Security has already confirmed that as of July 2023, 160 persons with potential terrorist connections have been encountered along the southern border. This was an increase from the approximate 100 encounters in 2022. (Keep in mind, these numbers don’t include people that managed to slip by undetected.)
Asking the locals that live along the southern border gives us insight into how the situation is panning out. Sheriff Coe’s testimony gives us a grim picture of the current state of the southern border.
“We’re experiencing a silent invasion of military age men,” - Brad Coe, Kinney County Sheriff (Texas)
Interview with Brad Coe, Kinney County Sheriff
The “silent invasion,” Coe said, is being committed primarily by single, military age men between the ages of 17 and 45 who are illegally entering the U.S. They’re wearing camouflage and carrying backpacks, according to video captured by cameras placed throughout the county viewed by The Center Square. Many are armed and dangerous, committing robberies and engaging in shootouts with law enforcement, Coe said.
So, who’s sending all of these people that are on terrorist watch lists and treating the southern border like a battleground? What are they here to do? And what is their end goal?
One of these groups is the Chinese Communist Party
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), established in 1921, has had a significant impact on shaping China's history and its current global position. It was founded by people like Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, who were motivated by the ideas of Marxism and Leninism, aiming to make drastic changes in China. Over time, the CCP's ideals have changed, including new thoughts from leaders like Deng Xiaoping, who opened China to the world, and the current leader, Xi Jinping, who is pushing for a modern version of socialism in China.
The CCP also seeks to influence and propagate their beliefs and ideologies within the United States
One of the ways they hope to accomplish these goals is by spreading fake news and indoctrination (of their ideologies) in early education. A recent report has brought to light an astonishing revelation - the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a whopping investment of $17 million into American educational institutions. These initiatives have been given the nickname "little red classrooms" and are more formally known as Confucius Institutes.
These programs have been traced to around 143 school districts across 34 states.
While these institutes claim to have the noble objective of teaching language and culture, there are concerns raised by Parents Defending Education, a grassroots organization working to reclaim our schools from harmful agendas. They argue that the true intention behind these institutes is to advance the global influence of the communist party.
“Xi Jinping believes that China will not be stopped from imposing its will and ideology onto American citizens. It provides an opportunity for the teachers or those who work with them to spot who might be a good candidate down the road, or who might be sympathetic to their cause, and try and shape the next generation that way.” - Former intelligence officer, Matt Shoemaker
This statement from Shoemaker clearly highlights that the CCP is actively and persistently promoting their ideals and principles onto our children, influencing their thoughts, beliefs, and values in a deliberate manner. It is evident that the CCP is making a concerted effort to shape the minds of the younger generation, leaving a lasting impact on their perception of the world and their place in it.
In addition to this, the CCP is compromising U.S farmland.
China's laws prohibit the U.S from purchasing farmland within its borders, however, Chinese companies funded by the CCP face no such restrictions when it comes to acquiring farmland in the United States. This glaring disparity in regulations has led to a multitude of problems for the U.S agricultural sector.
One of the key issues stemming from this unfair agreement is the substantial increase in the price of land. As foreign entities, particularly those affiliated with the CCP, purchase large tracts of farmland, the demand for land surges, driving up its cost. Consequently, American farmers are finding it increasingly challenging to afford the acquisition of farmland, hindering their ability to expand their operations and meet the growing demands of the population.
Moreover, the location of the farmland being purchased by the CCP raises significant concerns. It is noteworthy that some of the acquired land is situated suspiciously close to nearby U.S military bases. This proximity has sparked fears of potential infiltration attempts or other nefarious activities. The potential security risks associated with such close proximity to military installations cannot be overlooked, and they further underscore the need for a thorough examination of this issue.
This ultimately leads to the significant risk of leaving our food supply chain vulnerable to severe attacks.
U.S Homeland Security has confirmed that the threat of attacks on the agricultural sector will continue to be on high alert throughout 2024. If a foreign entity infiltrates a country’s farmland that would mean they have a presence inside the country that could cause a physical attack on the supply chain or farmland.
On average, grocery stores are restocked every 3 days. This means that a strong disruption against the chain of supply this would lead to your local market/grocery store to being completely empty in less than a week.
.
This would cause nationwide famine for the U.S population.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for the U.S government to address this issue promptly and devise appropriate measures to safeguard the interests of American farmers and national security.
This acquisition of U.S farmland is a severe threat. However, this isn’t the only internal threat coming from the CCP.
There has been an emergence of various police headquarters inside the U.S that are being ran by the CCP.
A six-story glass facade building, center, is believed to be the site of a foreign police outpost for China in New York’s Chinatown, Monday, April 17, 2023. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
In April 2023, the Department of Justice indicted Lu Jianwang and Chen Jinping, two New York residents, for conspiring to act as agents of the CCP's Ministry of Public Security (MPS). They were found obstructing justice by destroying evidence of their communications with the MPS.
These two agents were discovered to be operating a MPS secret police station in Manhattan's Chinatown neighborhood, which was assisting the CCP's transnational repression by intimidating and threatening Chinese dissidents.
Lu Jianwang (left) being arrested for his alleged involvement with the Chinatown police station.
According to the Safeguard Defenders, a non-governmental organization, there are at least 102 known or suspected Chinese overseas police stations active in 53 countries. Compromised stations have been identified in New York City, Los Angeles, Houston, San Francisco, as well as smaller cities in Nebraska and Minnesota.
These secret headquarters are quite worrisome. The presence of multiple strongholds across the U.S. indicates that our adversaries are implementing a strategy of establishing physical bases in major cities to facilitate their operations within the U.S.
Not only this, CCP spies are actively compromising U.S government officials.
U.S officials have sent a letter to the FBI expressing concerns regarding recent reports that indicate a CCP spy targeted a Member of Congress on the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees to gain access and influence.
“Just this past week, it was revealed that a U.S. Representative with access to sensitive information developed a close relationship with an undercover Chinese spy.” - Ranking Member James Comer
An intelligence operative from the CCP, known as "Fang Fang," has established significant connections with elected officials at various levels of government. This includes a U.S. Congressman affiliated with the Democratic Party. Fang Fang's actions were carefully orchestrated by the Ministry of State Security (MSS), which was the main civilian spy agency of the CCP from 2011 to 2015. Given the unknown number of active CCP operatives and the wide-ranging operations conducted by the MSS throughout our nation, it is possible that numerous elected officials may have been compromised without even knowing it.
‘Fang Fang’ with Eric Swalwell (Cali U.S Rep.), Ro Khanna (U.S Congressman), Mike Honda (Congressman)
Aside from attempts to compromise government officials, another objective they have is to erode the trust that the American people have in their government institutions, thereby jeopardizing our social cohesion and democratic processes.
U.S. adversaries will persist in their efforts to disseminate false information and propaganda.
The Department of Homeland Security has recently released a warning, stating that disinformation campaigns will be further bolstered by the increasing availability of advanced cyber and AI tools. This will serve as valuable resources for these malicious actors. It is predicted that adversaries will employ a wide range of tactics and strategies to manipulate and influence U.S. audiences in the lead up to the forthcoming 2024 election.
China has utilized state and proxy media, as well as coordinated, inauthentic social media campaigns, to influence US audiences. U.S Homeland Security’s Threat Assessment 2024 showed how something like this has already happened. In April 2023, a Chinese government-controlled news site utilized a generative AI platform to promote a previously circulated false claim. According to this claim, it was alleged that the United States was operating a laboratory in Kazakhstan for the purpose of developing biological weapons to be used against China.
Misinformation like this can spread like wildfire and has the potential of causing all kinds of damage. Our adversaries will be looking to exploit these modern tools in order to promote skepticism and distrust, which in turn causes loss of unity and trust throughout the entire country.
The various tactics employed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) highlight a strategic and multi-layer approach to influence and asserting power.
The revelations about "little red classrooms," the targeting of U.S. farmland, and the operation of secret police stations on American soil illustrate a clear effort to embed Chinese influence deeply within American society. Additionally, the compromising of U.S. officials and the propagation of fake news and propaganda further demonstrate the CCP's commitment to undermining U.S. security, trust in government, and social cohesion. These developments call for an urgent and comprehensive response from the U.S. government and its citizens to safeguard national security, preserve democratic processes, and protect the integrity of American institutions against such foreign threats.
As we shift our focus from the Chinese Communist Party it is crucial to turn our attention to another significant player with a long history of attempting to shape Western perspectives and policies—the Muslim Brotherhood. Much like the CCP, the Muslim Brotherhood has embarked on a campaign to extend its ideological footprint within the United States and beyond. However, unlike the state-backed maneuvers of the CCP, the Brotherhood's approach intertwines religious, social, and political ideals.
The Muslim Brotherhood
Since its inception, Islam and its followers has garnered a reputation for being strong promotors of their religion. In fact, the Quran makes it a point that spreading Islam all over the world is the duty of a Muslim.
To achieve this goal, several grassroots organizations were founded. Thanks to the Islamic leaders of the past, it has evolved into something much bigger.
The Muslim Brotherhood stands as the oldest and most influential Islamist movement, with its foundation laid in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna.
Portrait of Hassan Al-Banna, Muslim Brotherhood Founder
Al-Banna envisioned Islam not just as a religion, but as a comprehensive system governing all facets of life, both private and public. Initially conceived as a religious and social movement, the Brotherhood's scope gradually expanded into the political arena.
The Brotherhood's original vision held a very alarming belief; the justification of jihad, or holy war, aimed at converting and spreading Islam among non-believers.
“Allah is our goal; the Messenger is our model; the Koran is our constitution; jihad is our means; and martyrdom in the way of Allah is our aspiration.” - the Muslim Brotherhood slogan
This ideological stance led the group down a path of violence during the 1930s and 1940s, as it sought to achieve its objectives. This period of aggression prompted severe backlash from the Egyptian government, leading to persecution that forced many members to seek refuge in Europe and North America. These events facilitated the establishment of the Muslim Brotherhood's presence in the West, laying the roots for its current state.
Emblem of the Muslim Brotherhood
This portion of the article seeks to explore the origins, ideologies, and the consequential shift of the Muslim Brotherhood from a local Egyptian movement to a significant player on the international stage and how this affects our current age.
In examining the Muslim Brotherhood's agenda within the West, our primary source of evidence is an internal memorandum written by a senior member of the Brotherhood in the United States in 1991.
This document, pivotal in understanding the Brotherhood's intentions, was used as evidence during the U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation trial by the Department of Justice [we’ll dive into the trial later in the article].
Cover of the Muslim Brotherhood memorandum. [the entire document with English translation will be under References]
The memorandum outlines a complex and multifaceted goal: the destruction of Western civilization through a long-term civilization-killing Jihad from within (“by their [our] hands”) and through sabotage (“the hands of the believers”) and, secondly; to support the global Islamic movement to establish an Islamic super-state, the caliphate
The Ikhwan [religious militia] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions
To achieve this overarching goal, the Brotherhood has set forth a series of sub-goals, each designed as stepping stones towards realizing their ultimate goal. These include:
1. Establishing the Islamic Movement & Adopting Muslim Causes Domestically and Globally: This first step involves laying the groundwork for an Islamic movement within North America that aligns with global Muslim causes, thereby creating a unified front that transcends local and national issues, advocating for a global Islamic identity.
2. Expanding & Unifying the Muslim Base & Efforts: By broadening the base of supporters and unifying their efforts, the Brotherhood aims to strengthen the Muslim community's influence, creating a united and mobilized force that can effectively propagate the Islamic movement's ideals and objectives.
3. Presenting Islam as a Civilization Alternative: A crucial component of the Brotherhood's strategy is to promote Islam not merely as a religion but as a viable alternative to Western civilization.
4. Supporting the Establishment of the Global Islamic State Wherever It Is: The ultimate goal of the Brotherhood is the establishment of a global Islamic state or caliphate. This goal underlines the organization's commitment to a borderless Islamic identity, striving to unite the world under a single political and religious entity.
As we delve deeper into the methodologies and tactics employed by the Muslim Brotherhood to achieve these sub-goals, it becomes evident that their agenda is not merely ideological but encompasses a well-orchestrated plan to infiltrate and influence Western societies from within. The following sections of this article will explore the ways through which the Brotherhood intends to accomplish these tasks, offering insights into the complex web of strategies deployed to further their agenda on a global scale.
Establishing Islamic Movement
The Muslim Brotherhood's expansion into the West began in an era where the movement's members sought refuge from persecution in their homelands after the jihad incidents.
Initially, those who arrived in America and Europe during the 1960s and 70s were not orchestrators of an organized plan to Islamize the West. However, the small, spontaneously formed organizations that emerged from these early Brotherhood members soon surpassed the most optimistic expectations of their founders, signaling the start of a significant presence within Western societies.
These early Brotherhood refugees, upon their arrival in the West, began to interact with students from the upper-middle class of their home countries. Many of these students, drawn to the prestigious universities in Europe and the United States for graduate studies, became the backbone of the Brotherhood's network outside the Islamic world.
This led to the formation of the Muslim Student Association (MSA), the first Muslim organization in Europe and North America. This organization was established in 1963 at the University of Illinois. This marked a significant milestone in the Brotherhood's Western journey, laying the foundational stones for its future endeavors.
The growth of these networks was fueled by a combination of ideological flexibility, relentless activism, and access to substantial funding. These elements allowed the initially small groups established by Brotherhood affiliates to expand exponentially, establishing a solid foothold in the West.
Recognizing the need to adapt to their new environment and to shed any stigma associated with their origins, these groups underwent a rebranding. The Muslim Brotherhood affiliates in the West eventually adopted names such as the Western Brothers and the Muslim American Society (MAS), with the latter being chosen as the official name following a decisive vote among leaders. This strategic move towards a more publicly active stance, without direct reference to their Brotherhood identity, marked a significant shift in their operational tactics.
Despite their relatively small membership, the "Western Brothers" have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to dominate Islamic discourse in the West. Their interpretation of Islam and political events has become the most readily accessible to the public, effectively monopolizing the conversation. This dominance is largely attributable to their ideological stance, activism, and funding, positioning them at the forefront of competition to be recognized as the main representatives with Western establishments.
Over the past two decades, no other Islamic movement has matched the visibility, political influence, and access to Western elites that the Western Brothers have achieved. This monopoly draws more people into following their agenda. Today, the global reach of the Muslim Brotherhood is undeniable, with groups in more than 80 countries tracing their origins back to the movement. Each of these groups operates with a degree of operational independence, yet they are united by a common vision.
The Muslim Brotherhood's ability to command smaller organizations is very alarming. At any time the MB can give orders to these groups and they'd be inclined to following orders, regardless if they are violent or not.
The presence the Muslim Brotherhood has established in the United States has given way for their other goals to progress. This involves the next goal we are going to discuss; the growth and unification of all Islamic organizations under one common ruler.
Expanding & Unifying Muslim Efforts
The creation of the Muslim Student Association in the 1960s has led to the proliferation of numerous entities, among these are the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). These organizations boast comprehensive resources, including magazines, websites, annual conferences, and regional branches.
Despite the diversity of their operations, a thread of unity weaves through them, this is showed in shared financial sources, interlocking boards of directors, and collaboration in common initiatives. This network, run by a few individuals, is bound by not just professional or familial ties but, crucially, by a shared ideological commitment.
The individuals at the helm of these organizations are not only well-connected but also highly educated and motivated. They represent a small but influential leadership clique, commanding significant influence despite their small followings. This dynamic underscores a peculiar aspect of their operation: a well-organized minority has effectively positioned itself as the unofficial yet de facto voice of a largely unorganized and silent Muslim majority in the United States.
Among these organizations, CAIR stands out for its visibility and the controversy surrounding its activities. Officially, CAIR presents itself as a mainstream public affairs organization dedicated to fostering a positive image of Islam and Muslims in America. However, it has faced accusations of espousing and furthering terrorist agendas.
These allegations are not without high-profile acknowledgment; for instance, Steve Pomerantz, a former Assistant Director and Chief of Counterterrorism at the FBI, had this to say:
It is clear from a review of CAIR statements and activities that one of its goals is to further the agenda of radical Islamic terrorist groups by providing political support. By masquerading as a mainstream public affairs organization, CAIR has taken the lead in trying to mislead the public about the terrorists and their feelings of militant Islamic movements. - Steve Pomerantz, former Assistant Director and Chief of Counterterrorism at the FBI
According to Pomerantz, CAIR's strategy involves masquerading as a benign public affairs entity while covertly advancing the causes of militant Islamic movements.
This critique highlights an alarming problem in the United States: the existence of sub-organizations, while publicly denying any links to the Muslim Brotherhood or extremist ideologies, contributes to agendas aligned with terrorism and holy war, whether intentionally or not.
Present Islam as a Civilization Alternative
Over the past two decades, organizations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood in the West have undergone significant tactical changes.
These adjustments reflect a recognition of their operational limits and opportunities within Western societies. A primary objective of these organizations has been the preservation of an Islamic identity among Muslims in the West, aiming not to isolate them from mainstream society but to strengthen their faith within a pluralistic context.
A key ambition shared across these groups is to achieve recognition through official representatives of the Muslim communities in their respective Western countries. These organizations believe that establishing strong relationships with American elites could yield significant financial, political, and legitimacy benefits, thereby enhancing their influence and reach within the community.
The quest for recognition is strategic, aiming to secure a position from which they can lobby government on issues related to Islam, both domestically and internationally. This approach highlights the Brotherhood's long-term vision, focusing on the cultivation of future Muslim leaders who can shape the discourse and direction of the community moving forward.
However, the track record of Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated leaders in the West has raised concerns. A notable case is that of Abdul Alamoudi, a cofounder of the American Muslim Council in the 1990s, who established himself as a significant figure in political circles, engaging with administrations from both major U.S. political parties and Congress.
Alamoudi was once praised by the FBI for representing Islam in a mainstream setting and was tasked with training and vetting the imams who attend to the religious needs of Muslims in the U.S military.
Despite his initial portrayal as a moderate and successful Muslim leader, in 2003, Alamoudi was arrested with over $300,000 intended to support a plot linked to al-Qaeda. Further investigations revealed his financial connections to Hamas and al-Qaeda, leading to a 23-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to charges related to his activities.
This case illustrates the complexities and risks associated with leaders who have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. It demonstrates the challenges Western societies face in discerning the intentions and affiliations of individuals and organizations within the Muslim community, highlighting the necessity for vigilance and thorough vetting processes to ensure that partnerships and representations align with the values and security interests of Western countries.
Alamoudi’s story serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the potential consequences of entrusting individuals with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that has been accused of supporting agendas inconsistent with Western principles and security.
Supporting Establishment Of Global Islamic State
As discussed earlier, Western Brotherhood organizations have embarked on a patient approach towards Islamizing Western populations through what can be characterized as slow but steady social reform.
This strategic endeavor is distinguished by its non-violent nature and active participation in democratic processes, revealing a calculated decision to infiltrate societal systems rather than confront them directly. This method contrasts sharply with the tactics employed by groups like al Qaeda, indicating an understanding that gradual infiltration and influence within the system yield more sustainable results.
Leaders within the Muslim American Society (MAS), an organization with links to the Brotherhood, have been particularly sly at navigating questions about their identity and stance on sensitive issues.
When questioned about their affiliations, they are instructed to emphasize their independence, avoiding direct acknowledgment of any ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Furthermore, their approach to discussing terrorism and jihad reflects a complex balancing act—publicly denouncing terrorism while asserting jihad as a "divine legal right" for defense and the spread of Islam, emphasizing a strategic approach to controversial ideas that aligns with Western legal and cultural norms.
The desire for an Islamic state in America is considered a long-term goal by MAS. This practical approach acknowledges the limitations imposed by their smaller numbers, although they see the ongoing migration crisis at the southern border as a potential opportunity to increase their numbers.
One speaker said,
“We may all feel emotionally attached to the goal of an Islamic state in America, but it would have to wait because of the modest Muslim population. We mustn’t cross hurdles we can’t jump yet.”
Although this patient and slow reform could be seen as peaceful, unfortunately the reality is that these organizations continue to prove time and time again that they by no means are shying away from physical violence in order to progress their agenda. The Holy Land Foundation organization mentioned earlier is a prime example.
In the eyes of the public, the Holy Land Foundation was a charitable organization that was allegedly collecting millions for orphans in the Palestinian territories, but in reality the money was financing terrorist operations like Hamas.
Members of the Holy Land Foundation convicted in the trial.
The Holy Land Foundation trial is the largest terrorism financing case in American history, and it was able to shed light to the connections between the Holy Land Foundation, Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
A key piece of evidence was a transcript of a meeting at a Marriott Hotel, close to the Philadelphia International Airport. There, about 20 top Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood officials met in 1993. This meeting highlighted the Brotherhood's internal commitment to Hamas and the external need of masking its sympathies and activities from the American public.
Participants discussed strategies for continuing their support for Hamas all while maintaining a façade acceptable to the broader American society.
The activities and strategies of Western Brotherhood organizations, particularly their attempts to disguise their true intentions and justify support for groups like Hamas, further cement the risk of trusting these Islamic organizations in the West. The deliberate act of hiding their affiliations and objectives highlights the challenges faced by Western societies in distinguishing between genuine advocacy and covert extremism, emphasizing the need for vigilance and thorough examination of these organizations.
Connecting Everything
As we finish this extensive exploration of the multi-layer challenges posed by the infiltration and influence of foreign entities, particularly through the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Muslim Brotherhood, it's clear that America, and the West as a whole is going through a very tense moment in history. Values, ideologies, and ways of life are at risk of being overturned.
This situation should drive us to exert pressure on our elected officials to address this domestic crisis effectively. Critical engagement, comprehensive policy-making, and international cooperation will be key in addressing the threats posed by foreign influence operations. Furthermore, the situation calls for the U.S public to unite now more than ever.
A Message of Hope
As dire and tense the situation is, it is important to remember one thing above all else; Jesus Christ is in control. Believers have the unshakeable truth that no matter how dire the situation is we know that our Lord is sovereign and has already won the fight against evil. He is in control. Everything in the past, present and future is all accounted for in His Plan.
Stay tuned for future articles that will shed more light on current events (like the possibility and effects of an EMP attack) as well as a comprehensive guide on how to prepare yourself and your loved ones for possible “what-if” scenarios in the future.
