At first glance, these words may sound forward-thinking, as if the WEF is encouraging nations to rebuild better systems for humanity’s benefit. However, a deeper analysis reveals the Great Reset as more than a simple economic recovery plan.

 

It proposes a new global order where governments, corporations, and financial institutions work in unison to redesign the world's economy, healthcare, and governance structures—often at the cost of national sovereignty and individual liberty.

 

This is all about power and control.

 

The Great Reset seeks centralized control over key areas of human life, framed under the guise of addressing global challenges. They claim that this reset will be able to bring solutions to climate change, economic inequality, and public health.

 

The blueprint for the Reset involves four main agendas.

The first being Centralized Financial Systems.

 

 

The Reset promotes the idea of a cashless society through the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). These currencies, once fully adopted, will allow governments and banks to monitor every transaction. This new system will eradicate financial privacy, granting authorities total control over personal finances.

 

Not only would they be able to monitor individual finances, but they would have the ability to lock someone out of the financial system if their behaviors or opinions deviate from government-approved norms, similar to social credit systems implemented in some countries.

 

The next step is to redefine Healthcare under Global Supervision.

 

The WEF envisions a world where healthcare is globalized and digitized, shifting control from local governments to international organizations.

 

Initiatives like digital health passports and vaccine mandates are portrayed as essential for public safety, but in reality, they establish precedents for ongoing surveillance and control. These tools will create an opportunity to limit mobility and employment for people who refuse to comply with future mandates.

 

The third key strategy is to erode the prevalence of private property and individual freedoms.

 

 

Schwab’s famous statement, “You will own nothing, and you will be happy,” highlights one of the Reset’s most controversial goals—moving away from private ownership toward a shared economy model.

 

The idea of this statement comes from a Danish Politian named Ida Auken, who wrote an essay titled Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better. In the essay, she describes an economic system where all essential goods, needs, and services are provided as subscription services. This means people rent everything from housing to transportation, ultimately becoming dependent on corporations and governments for their most basic needs.

 

This shift also aligns with the WEF’s agenda for smart cities, where all aspects of daily life are tracked through digital technologies, and freedom of movement is heavily restricted.

 

The final piece of this great reset is the automation of labor for the digital economy.

 

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and robotics, the Great Reset advocates for a transformation of the labor force. However, this new economy will phase out millions of jobs, creating greater dependency on universal basic income (UBI) or state welfare programs.

 

While this is supposedly a solution to financial inequality, UBI will become a control mechanism, where participation in certain social programs or policies may be mandatory to receive benefits.

 

The goal of the Great Reset is to seize power from nations, handing control to global elites who want to shape our laws and lives. This diminishes the sovereignty of individual nations and shifts the balance of power towards unelected bureaucrats and global corporations.

 

 

Key decisions affecting the economy, public health, and climate policy would no longer be determined democratically but dictated by a centralized global framework. Policies with sweeping impacts—such as carbon taxation, energy consumption limits, and mass migration—are implemented without meaningful public debate, leaving citizens powerless to challenge them.

 

The United Nations (UN) stands at the forefront of the very global governance structures the WEF champions.

 

The United Nations (UN), originally founded in 1945 with the noble mission of maintaining peace and cooperation among nations, has morphed into a driving force of globalism, prioritizing a centralized world agenda over national interests. While the organization presents itself as a platform for diplomacy, its initiatives increasingly push for global governance, weakening the sovereignty of individual nations. A prime example of this is the UN Agenda 2030 which is supposedly a sustainable development framework.

 

However, a closer look reveals an alarming attempt to override national laws and impose uniform global policies across the globe.

 

 

Agenda 2030, framed as a set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), paints an appealing picture of a wonderful world—free from poverty, hunger, and environmental destruction. However, beneath this utopian vision lies a blueprint for centralized control. Through Agenda 2030, the UN advocates for policies that affect national economies, environmental regulations, and migration flows, raising concerns about how far these policies encroach on the autonomy of sovereign states.

 

And one of the biggest excuses the UN uses to encroach on this autonomy is “climate change”.

 

The UN's climate agenda plays a major role in Agenda 2030, with calls for global carbon taxes, energy restrictions, and decarbonization mandates. While these policies are framed as essential for combating climate change, in reality they will force countries to adopt costly policies dictated by international bodies. This will grant unprecedented authority to those in power, allowing them to exert control over virtually every aspect of human existence.

 

And for developing nations? These restrictions may limit industrial growth and economic self-reliance, while wealthier nations are pressured to redistribute resources through climate-related funding schemes. This will clearly result in a growing dependency on international aid and regulations, weakening national economies.

 

 

Another crucial yet often overlooked aspect of the UN agenda is the weakening of national borders.

 

Agenda 2030 treats migration as a "human right" and promotes open-border policies. This is done under the guise of addressing humanitarian concerns. In reality, these policies disrupt social cohesion, strain national resources, and erode cultural identities. Nations that attempt to restrict immigration for security or economic reasons are pressured by the UN and labeled as xenophobic or isolationist.

 

The UN even started an initiative called The Global Compact for Migration, that closely aligns with Agenda 2030. This compact will introduce frameworks that encourage mass migration flows, diminishing the ability of sovereign nations to control their borders and immigration laws.

 

This is exactly why we see nations around the country being completely overran by migrants. (We’ve got a whole episode in the vault for this topic… Stay tuned.)

 

So, upon examining the UN’s true intentions, what can we conclude?

Well, it's clear.

The true agenda of the UN is all about control. Sovereign governments are increasingly required to surrender decision-making powers to this world government.

 

 

This shift towards global governance is part of a broader strategy to reshape the world’s political and economic systems. The emphasis on collective action serves to normalize top-down control by unelected bodies.

 

And don’t be fooled, anyone who speaks out against this agenda will certainly be portrayed as enemies of peace.

 

But we know this is a lie. The media plays a critical role in shaping public perception, portraying opposition to globalism as backward or extremist. The rejection of these ideas publicly leads to scrutiny and censorship, especially when taking place online. Most social media platforms remove and censor content that tries to expose this agenda. Our ministry has experienced this firsthand.

 

Not only is there censorship, but there are even more severe consequences for speaking out against this agenda.

 

We’ve seen politicians who speak out against globalist agendas slandered in the media, and Robert Fico, the prime minister of Slovakia, is a prime example. Fico’s November 17, 2023, speech criticized the proposed World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty and mandatory vaccination policies, sparking considerable controversy. He discussed the dangers of centralized health mandates, and even warned how they could erode national sovereignty and individual freedoms.

 

His speech was obviously highly criticized by the media conglomerates and other politicians. However, things escalated severely when an attempt on his life occurred in May 2024. Reports indicate that Fico was shot multiple times in front of a government building and was rushed to receive emergency surgeries.

 

 

Although his injuries were severe, Fico survived the assassination attempt. Slovak officials described the assailant as a lone actor, but the political divide and heated rhetoric in Slovakia suggest deeper roots to the attack.

 

Fico’s case shows just how powerful these global entities already are. And this isn’t the only case where this happened.

 

This situation with Fico isn't the only example of a politician receiving severe consequences for rejecting globalism

 

There's another politician who publicly rejected globalism and faced harsh persecution for it.

 

Thats right. Donald Trump

 

Trump made it clear that he opposed the globalist agenda, promoting policies of national sovereignty and American interests. His “America First” agenda sought to pull the U.S. out of entangling global agreements, such as the Paris Climate Accord and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Trump also criticized the influence of international organizations like the WHO and the World Economic Forum, arguing that these entities prioritize elite interests at the expense of the common citizen.

 

And let's be clear, this is an honest assessment of these organizations' true intentions. However, we know this type of speech isn’t welcomed

 

Trump's stance triggered a powerful backlash from global elites, corporate media, and political adversaries, who accused him of being a destabilizing force on the world stage. As with Fico, the consequences of rejecting globalism were not just limited to media slander or political isolation. During his presidency, Trump faced multiple assassination threats, with the Secret Service thwarting numerous plots. The most notable of these was when he was shot in the ear during a campaign rally.

 

 

To be clear, we're not asserting that these assassination attempts were solely motivated by the rejection of globalism. However, it's evident that those who openly oppose the global agenda face constant threats and attacks. Both leaders took bold stands for national sovereignty, individual freedoms, and economic independence—values that directly conflict with the vision of global governance.

 

So, when we analyze the overarching agenda of globalist organizations propagating worldwide mandates and statutes, it becomes abundantly clear that this system is the precursor to the beast described in Revelation.

 

Now look, it would be a bold claim to come out and plainly say that the globalist organizations such as the UN, WHO, and WEF are indeed the Beast of the Sea from the Bible. Thats not the point of this article. However, it is important to see that though the Beast may not be unleashed upon the Earth fully, Satan and his workers are working overtime to prepare the system for the antichrist and his system.

 

These organizations are actively working to strategically and systematically pave the way for the demonic government prophesied to arise in the last days. It’s abundantly clear that their efforts are not merely about coordinating global governance. They are establishing a framework of control and compliance that aligns with the description of end-times rule found in biblical prophecy.

 

However, one crucial component of this framework is the financial system that will be the foundation of this global government and bring an unprecedented level of surveillance.

 

Stay tuned for Episode III, where we continue unveiling the truth about the beast system.

 

Remember, the most crucial thing is not only to know the truth but to diligently walk in it. Pray, read your Bible, and ask the Lord for discernment. In these troubling times, many liars and deceivers will arise with the sole goal of leading God's children astray. Stay alert, stay prepared, and stay tuned to The One Truth!